Archive for March, 2008

More than a month ago, we featured a post about the paradox of self-promotion. This paradox describes, that although social media frowns on self-submission…

[...] the sheer numbers of new videos, posts, sites, pictures, and stories appearing each and every day, [means] self-promotion is a necessity for anyone starting out and hoping to gain any sort of foothold.

Debates occasionally emerge, discussing the narcissistic and moral aspects of self-submission. While several social networks do not officially accept self-submitted content, it has been argued that self-submission is not wrong and in fact necessary. I’m not interested here in these aspects of self-submission.

Instead I want to concentrate on the logical reasons to refrain from submitting your own content.
These of course depend on the social network you are participating and submitting content. But if we take StumbleUpon as example, we will see that letting others submit your content is a much better way of promotion.

StumbleUpon Logo

The Algorithm

First of all, let’s take a look at the algorithm of StumbleUpon. Although this is not verified information, it has been noticed that when the same user repeatedly submits articles from the same blog, the posts will not get promoted. So if you practice self-submission regularly, after a while you will notice that your traffic will not show any pretty peaks. Tim Nash writes:

[...] the number of times the domain is stumbled by a user is a factor therefore the initial stumblers audience score is affected by the number of times they have previously stumbled the domain. If this is done for both the initial stumbler and all stumblers thumbing the page up or down it would explain why mailing lists and friends stumbling the same domain has less and less effect.

Clustering

One of the basic rules of social networks – in fact, of networks in general – is clustering. In simple terms the rule says that most people’s friends are also to some extent friends of each other.

Every time you stumble something, the people that mostly see your stumble are your fans and mutual friends. In most cases, these are the ones who will continue promoting the submission. If you often promote your own work, the articles will be recycled among you and your friends – your strong ties; your content will never go beyond your network, due to the principle of clustering.

On the other hand if you leave your post to take its own course – to be discovered by someone else – it will appear in different circles. Never disregard the strength of weak ties (see Mark Granovetter’s research on weak ties for more information. It’s a *.pdf file).

Being Social

As mentioned by Matt, social networks are about being social.

You never know, next month you might have twice as many subscribers and realize that TheNanny612, Zaibatsu, and DoshDosh all think your stuff is great. You wont know if you don’t stop for a second and take a look.

If you don’t let other people submit your work, you are just giving a monologue. Let social networks become a part of the dialogue and learn from it. If you are interested in improving your site and promoting your content more successfully, stop submitting your stuff and start observing its development:

  • See who submits your content. They might be loyal readers, that you didn’t know. Check out their work, make a contact with them. You will notice, that they will return to your blog with a stumble.
  • Study which articles are being stumbled. Not every post is appropriate for every social network. Observe which posts get stumbled and which ones get popular. If you have a sharp eye, you will manage to direct the attention of stumblers to every post you write.

Conclusion

I don’t think there is any moral obstacle in self-submissions. If you don’t overdo it and choose wisely which post to submit where, it is a practice necessary to make yourself heard. But it is also a very easy and certain practice; you have daily 200+ pageviews and you call it a day.

You will notice much more satisfactory results when you think beyond this strategy. Refraining from self-submissions is a learning process. You learn more about your readers, about the content they like, and how to draw their attention. You are also facing a challenge, which alone motivates you for further improvement.

Of course, that’s my humble opinion. Do you let your community do the submitting? Are you analyzing the submissions and submitters to improve your work and your network?

23 Comments

You have two choices:

  1. Begin utilizing social media as part of your overall marketing strategy.
  2. Don’t use social media and watch angrily while your competitors put you out of business.

Which do you chose?

47-social1-031708 We at Pandemic Labs have been preaching this evangel since the formation of the company. Don’t worry, we are not nearly so arrogant as to think that we were lone crusaders for the cause. Greater thinkers than us such as Seth Godin and David Meerman Scott have been on the bandwagon since before there was a bandwagon. However, I truly believe that right now we are in the midst of a shift in marketing dollars on a tectonic scale. This belief is not just entrepreneurial optimism; the signs are all around us. I can see proof of the change right in my own office as new clients are coming faster than ever before. And then I saw an AdAge article by Beth Snyder Bulik which further signals what I have been thinking all this time.

I’ll begin by quoting a great bit of the article which mirrors my own sentiments so much that I smiled while reading:

However, for marketers, it’s a better idea to first do the back-end work of research to decide what they want to accomplish, what they want to say and how they’ll say it. You’ll also need to either appoint or hire someone to write and monitor the blog posts and responses. Nothing is worse than a half-assed blog with infrequent updates and little customer relevance or connecting.

I could not agree more. I expressed the same sentiments in an interview for Knowledge@Wharton:

“People come to us saying, ‘I hear viral video is cool. How do we do it?’ That’s funny, because if a company wanted to do a TV campaign, they wouldn’t walk into [advertising agency] Ogilvy and say, ‘TV is cool. How do we do it?’” The first question companies should ask themselves, says Peters, is, “‘What do I want to accomplish from this form of marketing?

I do have one major disagreement with the article. Towards the end of the article Bulik says, “Social media is not, as yet, a great ad network, and it probably isn’t a great long-term traffic generator or brand builder.” I don’t think this is an accurate statement. While it is true that social media is not an “ad network,” I think it is certainly a long term traffic generator and most definitely a great brand builder.

In its various incarnations, social media is one of the most powerful ways to begin dialogues with consumers. Those conversations are absolutely building your brand. As we move forward, it will become clear that those brands which converse with and engage consumers will leave other brands in the dust. How can one claim that social media is not a brand builder? Even if Bulik were to believe that social media is not currently a “long-term traffic generator or brand builder,” her phrasing unfairly discounts the future potential of social media as it continues to evolve.

Overall, though, it’s a great article and I am happy to see it in AdAge. What are your thoughts on the reported growth of the industry? Let me know in the comments.

2 Comments

image credit: notsogoodphotography

When was the last time you were truly captivated? What was it that captivated you? Was it a performance? A charismatic speaker? A person’s eyes? A piece of music? There are many things it could have been, but I bet I can tell you what it wasn’t: a piece of marketing.

Let’s face it, marketing and advertising efforts aren’t usually the kind of things that capture your attention. Indeed, I cannot think of any recent marketing element in any medium that has held my attention hostage to the extent of the beautiful eyes in the picture above.

At this point, some older, traditional marketers are snickering at me. Too many in the outmoded marketing aristocracy think “captivate” is a nonsense word. “Captivate is a like Innovate,” they say, “easy to toss into your tagline or mission statement, but nearly impossible to truly achieve.” While I don’t agree that it is impossible, I concede that truly captivating your target consumers is difficult.

But that’s a lousy reason not to try.

So let’s try! Let’s look at some ways we can not only engage consumers, but how we can captivate them.

Engage Their Emotions

This is the element at which I fail most often. I fall into a trap which many often do: I engage my own emotions and expect that it will result in the same for my target consumers. If you’re a novelist this Image Credit: *MarSworks out OK because you can always fall back on “I don’t give a damn what others think, I write only for myself!” Alas, it might be just the opposite for marketers.

To better appeal to consumers’ emotions, it helps to remember one thing: emotions are not logical. I am incredibly moved by Beethoven’s 9th Symphony, but my reaction has nothing to do with the mathematical precision of its counterpoint. In fact, my music-major business partner once began to explain some of the theory to me, and I realized I didn’t care….I didn’t want to know. Similarly, I feel an emotional response when I see an Aston-Martin Vanquish, but it has absolutely nothing to do with what’s under the hood or the fact that it is an utterly impractical car for New England winters.

In final illustration of this first point I present an example from my own recent experience. Last week I wrote a five-page proposal for launching a client’s new company blog. I covered everything, showing not only what we could do, but how we would do it. Upon reading the proposal, the client called me and said, “I just read the first paragraph of the thing you sent me and I’m sold. What the hell is all the rest of this crap?” Not only didn’t he read the details, he didn’t want to read them. For him it was all about my first paragraph, a high-level, impassioned preamble that answered not the how/what/where/when, but the why. It captivated him, his attention held such that he didn’t even need to keep reading. He wanted to move right to the services. The details (which engaged me) were worthless.

Use Multimedia:

I laugh when I hear the term multimedia because it reminds me of the 1998 Encarta Encyclopedia CD that announced proudly it was a multimedia encyclopedia. Multimedia is now taken for granted…it’s just the way things are. But I’m surprised how many marketers are not using or misusing audio, video, and images in their efforts.

image credit: Dan ZenA picture may be worth a thousand words, but the right picture is priceless. Great visuals have been a staple of advertising for decades and using imagery is one of the easiest and most touted methods for captivating consumers online. Pictures often evoke an emotional response more directly than a paragraph of text. Imagery removes the burden of processing a long string of alphanumeric characters, leaving the consumer’s brain free to feel. Please note that I am not claiming imagery evokes a better emotional reaction than text, simply that it evokes a quicker reaction. And in the age of ten second attention spans, quicker sometimes means better.

Video is another way to appeal to the powerful emotional responses of your consumers and hold their attention. I daresay that if you believe in the power of pictures then the power of video is self-evident. The “moving picture” has been the dominant form of advertising for decades and that’s not an accident. Video engages…it captivates. Enriching your site, your blog, your news release with video hits your consumers with a 1-2 punch; the video captures their attention and your copy answers the details they might need to finally decide to buy.

Last, but certainly not least, is the power of audio. If you’re not sold on the power of sound then go rent “The Lord of The Rings: The Two Towers” and try to watch the Helm’s Deep sequence with the sound muted. It’s nigh unwatchable. Why? Because sound is the foundation from which the tower of human emotion rises. Sound conveys inflection, timing, harmony, melody, and activates a wholly different area of the brain than the text and imagery perceived through the eyes. Even the simple act of putting blog posts into podcast form can be powerful. The narration of your podcast will allow you to convey emotional elements of your text to listeners in a captivating way, often enabling you to hold their attention for longer periods of time.

Be a Human:

It is difficult to establish a rapport with a faceless corporate monolith. I, for one, would much rather speak to a person than a logo. I doubt that I’m alone in this.image credit: TheArtfulBadger Blogging and marketing gurus spend a lot of time talking about developing your “voice.” At it’s most basic level, your “voice” is the digital representation of your personality. Notice the important root of “personality:” person. It is difficult for a company or brand to have a personality with which people can engage.

The transmission of a person’s personality into the digital space is not easy, and there are few things that make it harder than writing by committee. Perhaps your shiny new company blog is still viewed as an experiment by the fundamentalists in charge of your company’s marketing department. As such, the task of writing the weekly blog entry falls to some junior staffer fresh out of college. Although the higher-ups won’t deign to write the blog posts, they are still unwilling to publish a post without running it through the editorial wringer which is so often the bloody battlefield from which press releases and corporate statements emerge mutilated and impotent. By the time the post is published it lacks any semblance of an individual voice and falls flat with any consumers who happen to read it.

Don’t fear the voices of the people who write your company blog. You’ve presumably hired these people because they are smart. Let them out of the box. Let them connect with consumers and maybe–just maybe–you’ll find yourself the proud recipient of a captive audience that genuinely respects the honesty of your online ambassadors. People are smart enough to realize that Microsoft cannot have a conversation with them, but people within Microsoft certainly can.

I am reminded of a anecdote related to me by Larry Weber. His daughter came downstairs one day, laughing. Larry asked her what was wrong. Barely containing her giggles she said, “Coke wants to be my friend.” To her, and millions of others like her, the idea that Coke wanted to be her friend on Facebook was absurd. Her friends are people, her friends can go to the movies with her. A brand does not fit any definition of the word and she knew it instinctually. Be human or be laughed at.

Conclusion:

There are undoubtedly many other ways to captivate your consumers, but this post is getting long and the flight I’m on is about over. I suppose the value of this post is found not so much in a rigid adherence to the three methods, but in an increased receptivity to new marketing ideas. Every company is different, and no two brands alike. As such, the exact method of your new marketing endeavors can take many shapes. What’s important is to realize that the internet presents everyone–startups and Fortune 500s alike–an unprecedented avenue through which to converse with consumers. Captivate them. Engage them. Or lose them.

2 Comments

More questions than answers regarding the acceptance of plagiarism in social media.

The other day, I visited my favorite social news site, Mixx, and saw something that sparked a lot of questions in Plagiarismmy head. It was an article, quite popular on Mixx in the few hours it had existed, that had an interesting title. The truly interesting part of the title was that it was only one word off from the exact title of an entry on this blog less than one month ago. Furthermore, the title structure (exactly the same between the two posts) was very specific. The title-similarity alone got my attention. I was further sucked in when I noticed the writer of the new article on Mixx had read (or at least voted for) the article on our blog when it came out last month and, yet, he had not even mentioned the original post in his new post. No link, no citing, no credit given even to the idea what-so-ever.

Intrigued, I read the post and left a comment expressing my confusion with the forgotten link or possible plagiarism (in addition to providing more standard commentary on the content of the post). Since the title and main thrust of the content was largely similar to the original post on our blog I really wanted desire feedback or at least explanation from the new writer.

While this is a predictable, emotional response (”he’s ripping off my partner’s ideas!”) it is not worth giving real weight to. The actual interesting part of this whole episode is not how I reacted initially, but the question “how I should react in the future?” It seems there may be some changing in the definition of plagiarism as related to social media. The aforementioned unanswered questions that burst into my head are:

  1. To be honest, I liked the new post. I thought it added value to my morning and was definitely worth a read. Do these facts remove the need of the author to give credit to where credit is due? Is credit due?
  2. It would seem to me that if I wrote a new book on sales/negotiation and titled it “Getting to an Affirmative”, I’d have some credit to give and a link to include (and possibly some royalties to pay). Is the analogous situation valid? If not, why not? If so, is this same rule not true with social media?
  3. Occasionally some blogs or social news sites will tackle the same issues, ideas and content at the same time. This is an unavoidable fact of having 60 million blogs in this world. Does that mean “plagiarism” is no longer a problem in social media? Or has the rule merely gotten more lax?
  4. If the rules have loosened, where do they stand now?
  5. In the theoretical sense, if our population growth and internet usage continued to increase without bounds, we would eventually reach a point where there were identical (or nearly identical) posts being written by unrelated people concurrently. That wouldn’t be plagiarism as neither writer would have seen the other’s post prior to writing. Are we there already?

In the particular case, the author of the questionable blog post explained the genesis of his post to me in such a way that convinced me that he did not mean to plagiarize in any way. Does his good intent clear his name?

Personally I think the “plagiarism line” is definitely moving and re-hashing people’s content is becoming more acceptable due to increased acceptance in the community. I would guess these pressures come from the ever-increasing number of posts and the rather finite bits of news in any given day. If this is true, the biggest question that every one of us needs to consider is “is this changing definition plagiarism a step forward or a step back?”

I’m not so sure I have an answer to that one yet.

8 Comments

One of the best sites you can join to connect with other bloggers is Blog Catalog. PandemicBlog has had the good fortune of being able to sit down with Tony Berkman and Oscar Tijerina of Blog Catalog to discuss their past, their new widget and the future of the site itself. This is the second interview in a series of interviews which PandemicBlog will be conducting with movers and shakers in the worlds of social media and marketing.

Blog Catalog

For those out there who are new to the game, give me the one sentence description of Blog Catalog.

BlogCatalog is the fastest-growing member-driven social community for bloggers.

Isn’t BlogCatalog a lot like MyBlogLog? How are you different? How are you better?

BlogCatalog’s purpose is to help bloggers connect, share ideas, and grow through group and general discussions. It also provides a variety of tools, features, and widgets to help bloggers. So our emphasis is on building a community and helping bloggers rather than an interactive volume-driven blog directory. We also screen blogs to minimize splogs, spammers, and questionable content.

What are your vital stats? How long have you been around? How much have you grown? How many users do you have?

When Angie Alaniz and I acquired it last year, BlogCatalog was a basic blog directory with a heavy emphasis on adult content and splogs. Our team cleaned up the membership and began integrating robust social network features such as a general discussion board, groups, and neighborhood feeds. Since then, we’ve added a number of tools and campaigns that strengthen the community and help bloggers improve their blogs. Right now, BlogCatalog has approximately 100,000 blogs indexed. More than 15,000 are submitted for review every month. Traffic, in the same period, has gone from 30,000 a month to well over 4 million.

We hear you’ve got a shiny new widget. Tell us about it?

Yes, that’s right. We just released a News Feed widget. It is a powerful little tool, that when added to your blog automatically displays what you are doing on social networks.

The widget is a member-driven application. Bloggers were telling us that they wanted to streamline networking, stay up to date with friends across the Web, and share their own social network activities without having to visit eight to twelve networks. So the widget was a logical next step in that it made this information customizable and portable. Portability is the next evolutionary step in social networks. People want to manage when, where, and how they share data. This widget helps do exactly that.

So it’s like social network cross-pollination! What is the biggest benefit of this for the average blogger?

The biggest benefit for most bloggers is that it allows your friends to know what you’ve said on Twitter, what article you’ve submitted to Digg, what site you discovered on StumbleUpon, or what song you’ve listened to on Last.fm where ever you place the widget. This also allows them to connect with you on Twitter, Digg the article you submitted, check out the site you stumbled, or discover that you have some of the same musical interests. It makes sense because people tend to connect online with people who they share interests with.

How many people have begun to use the widget since launch? Is it too early to ask?

It’s too early to say. However, what you might find interesting is that many bloggers have already found that the widget can be used for a number of additional applications. Some bloggers are using it for a recommendation tool, some bloggers are using it to update one blog across multiple blogs, some are using it to increase their opportunity for a viral post and some have set it up in a way that only displays their affiliate marketing links. It’s become their product recommendation engine. It’s surprisingly versatile in ways we never considered; every day, different bloggers are trying to find new uses for it. We originally looked at the widget as a way for bloggers to make their social network activities public on their blogs. No matter how you use it, it adds real value to a blog.

The widget connects with your social dashboard on BlogCatalog, right?

Yes. Except, rather than share information about all your friends, it only shares your activities. Unless, you point to your friends post, link, or StumbleUpon, Digg, etc. submission.

When the widget is placed on a blog will it increase page load times?

Not that we are aware of, at least not in any noticeable amount.

You mention on your website that this widget will help things to go viral. How will it help?

As I mentioned, if you submit an article to Digg, anyone who subscribes to your widget or sees the widget on a blog or site might Digg that article. Even more amazing, if your friend Diggs it and also has the widget, then all his or her friends might also Digg it. That’s a very powerful way to share information.

Isn’t the “viral potential” something that is still very dependent on the number of people following an individual? If I don’t have a large community of friends then just because I Digg something doesn’t mean that it will now go viral.

There are never any guarantees that something will go viral. However, the size of your friend network or number of blog readers is not part of that equation. We know several bloggers that have very few friends and readers by comparison to top ranked bloggers. Yet, these bloggers are read by top ranked bloggers. So sometimes it’s not about the quantity of people you know, but the quality of people you know.

Other than the potential for more efficient viral spread, do you think the widget has potential for marketers to reach consumers in new ways? Have you thought about that at all?

I suppose there are applications, but we really didn’t develop the widget for marketing purposes. We developed it to help bloggers.

What’s next for BlogCatalog in general? In terms of widgets?

What would you like to see next? … Maybe we’ll do that!

Is there anything that could make you leave/abandon BlogCatalog? (a tough one, we know)

There was a time last year when I was speaking with several potential investors, including venture capitalists, about the possibility of making BlogCatalog the next bright and shiny new object. But I decided to pass because it seemed to me that every proposal would require us to move away from our core values. Maybe one day BlogCatalog will be the darling of the Internet, but right now I like the idea of being a diamond in the rough. It gives us the opportunity to stay focused on helping bloggers and working to enhance their experience as opposed to always thinking about ourselves. It’s more fun our way, don’t you think?

_____________________________________________________

We’d like to thank the entire BlogCatalog team for agreeing to this interview and sharing their insight, history and vision. It will be very exciting to see how this new feed widget affects social media as a whole and to watch Blog Catalog grow in the coming year.

Keep an eye out for future interviews from the social media world.

6 Comments

There are countless guides about increasing the popularity of your blog. More or less, they are all concentrating on socializing, participating and of course creating quality content. Indeed, these are the most direct methods of getting your work noticed. These techniques are more or less taken for granted for everyone who has been in the blogosphere for a while. But there are also more indirect, more subtle ways to increase your popularity. One of them is the way you manage to combine your blog with your persona, your avatar.

image credit: brtsergio

The Avatar

The avatar is your face in cyberspace. It represents you in the networks in which you participate, it even says something about you: if you have humor, if you like cartoons, if you have artistic tendencies, what combination of chromosomes you have. It is only natural that you spend some time choosing this avatar. After all this is the first impression you leave.

A more wise, careful selection of your avatar can significantly boost your position in the networks in which you participate and, consequently, the popularity of your blog.

Let’s first see why and then concentrate on how.

Pavlov’s Dog

Ivan Pavlov’s famous experiment with his dog showed how animals (and humans) can be trained to respond in a certain way to a particular stimulus. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that people just react on signals without any critical thinking, but there are studies that prove that people tend to categorize objects and information. One simple reason is that it helps them manage their narrow memory scope. The study of social representations is just one theory explaining this natural human function.

In simpler words, our mind combines…

logos with products…



…ideals with colors…

red

…dressing styles with music…

bach

..and avatars with blogs.

That’s why if you make a very good selection of an avatar, it will help you increase your authority and your popularity.

How To Choose an Avatar

So your purpose when choosing an avatar is to combine it with your blog. When people see your avatar, they should immediately think of your blog. There are two main ways to do that:

Consistency

Be consistent. When you choose your avatar, use it in every network you participate. This doesn’t necessary mean using your blog logo. It can be the style of your blog, or its colors, even the type of images you use in your blog. Be creative. But when you choose this avatar, use it everywhere.
MarkDykeman
Mark Dykeman’s avatar is a very good example. His blog is called broadcasting-brain and his avatar stays on topic. I’ve seen him in at least 4 social networks (digg, mixx, SU, Sphinn) and he always uses the same avatar. After a while, the name of his avatar becomes irrelevant. The image is doing all the talking.

Difference

Try to be different. Choose an avatar, that draws attention. Remember, an avatar is your face and a mirror to your personality; you don’t want to look like everybody else.
RMonkeyGirl
Wouldn’t you click at Rhea’s avatar, to check her profile? Wouldn’t you go to her blog?

Conclusion

We sometimes don’t pay too much attention to details and choosing an avatar might not seem that noteworthy, but it is one of those small details that can really make a difference.

To prove my point here’s a question for you:
DoshDosh
Can you guess whose avatar is this? (click on it to find out)

This is a guest post by robojiannis. He writes at changemod.com about social networks and the evolution of the web.

13 Comments

image credit: Kevin SteeleThirty years ago, there were generally four traditional ways to get in touch with your target audience:

  • Television
  • Radio
  • Periodicals
  • And Outdoor or billboard advertising.

I think it goes without saying that times have changed. Websites can be created in minutes with Google Pages. Information can be monetized with Squidoo. Teenagers have invented a new, short character language to use when texting their friends.

The sound of a phone ringing has evolved from an ordinary “ring, ring,” to the owners’ favorite songs. We even have the choice of choosing a song for our callers to listen to while they’re waiting for us to pick up.

Facebook has evolved from an unknown social network into a popular, effective, and fun way for college students to easily keep in touch after graduation and beyond.

So how do we engage this new generation of internet and technology users? How do we capture the attention and trust of individuals whose worlds are so cluttered with information, advertisements, and a long list of aspirations and goals?

I spend a lot of time considering these questions because I am 22; I am on the leading edge of the generation that has known the internet for their entire lives.

The simple answer is to crawl your way through all that clutter, through that information overload, and sit yourself down right in front of their faces. If you play by the traditional rules and simply keep carrying out the same thing you’ve done in the past (even if it’s worked before), you’re going to lose the attention of this new generation to those taking the plunge and embracing the new media available today.

So, if I have you convinced to put yourself out there and crawl through the mess of social networks, advertisements, and cell phone ring tones, then what you should be asking, is how?

Three ideas: research, focus groups, and interaction. It all goes back to the fundamentals of marketing: you need to get to know your target audience.

  • Which forms of these new media are most often being used?
  • What activities are being engaged in on the internet?
  • Are their mobile devices internet-ready?
  • Do they read their email on Outlook, a web application, or a mobile phone?

Once you find out who your targets really are, you can apply these general rules of thumb in order to decide exactly how you should initiate initial communication.

  • Create a viral design: I know. This is easier said then done, but it still has to be said. If you create something as viral as the Evolution of Dance, which has elicited over 76 million views and over 120,000 comments since its debut in April 2006.
  • Encourage Interaction: create something fun to encourage viewers to spend some time on your site, such as Elf Yourself or Tide to Go’s “Be the Stain” application on it’s My Talking Stain website, based on its Superbowl ad this year.
  • Hire the young generation: outsource your research or creativity to your audience to encourage more interaction and create more of a viral effect. iRobot launched an excellent campaign in which they announced a contest asking users to discover alternate ways in which to use their Roomba vacuums.

Once you gain attention and reach the location directly in front of the target, the next step is to gain trust. You will only be able to do this if you are, indeed, trying to help them out in some way, instead of blatantly promoting your cause without communicating any benefit to them. So, gaining trust is something you have to think about from the very beginning.

Design your communication in a way that helps out the younger generation in some way. Give them free access to something they want in exchange for exposure to advertisements. Solve a problem they have no solution to. Otherwise, your blatant promotions will become annoying, and simply have a negative effect, instead of being successful.

Erica DeWolf is the Founder of and eMarketing Strategist for DeWolf eMarketing & Design, she blogs at eMarketing & New Media.

7 Comments